The Visa Bulletin for November was just released and the priority dates have not changed from October. For EB1 petitioners the priority date for China is September 1, 2017 and remains March 15, 2017 for India. All other countries are still July 1, 2019. For EB2 all countries except China and India remain “Current” and China is still August 1, 2016, while India remains July 1, 2009.
The U.S. Federal Court for the Southern District of New York issued an injunction against Trumps Public Charge Rule. The injunction prohibits USCIS from requiring any forms that require additional public charge information. The proposed “New” I-485 and the New I-944 were going to require additional information relating to the receipt of public assistance and other financial resources. Effective today, Monday October 14, 2019 all I-485 forms filed with USCIS, until further notice, will remain the standard I-485. If you would like to get your I-485 filed while the public charge rule is still enjoined please let us know.
A few minutes ago Senator David Perdue blocked “Unanimous Consent” in the Senate. As mentioned in our previous blog, it only takes one Senator to block unanimous consent. This means that Senate Bill 386 did not pass unanimous consent and must be debated prior to moving on to a vote of the Senate, unless unanimous consent can be reached in the future.
The October Visa Bulletin was issued today and the applicable filing dates for EB-2 Adjustment of Status for most countries are now current and the EB-1 priority dates, while still not current, have also moved forward considerably. Additionally, USCIS just announced that it will be using the “Dates For Filing” chart (as opposed to the “Final Action Dates”) for determining when we can file your Adjustment of Status application. This is great news! Also, today it was announced that Senate Bill 386 many pass the Senate Floor through Unanimous Consent. I will address both these important happenings below.
EB-2 PRIORITY DATES FOR OCTOBER 2019
ALL COUNTRIES: The October Visa Bulletin lifted the retrogression for ALL COUNTRIES with the exception of China and India.
CHINA: The applicable filing date for China is now August 1, 2016.
INDIA: The applicable filing date for India is now January 1, 2015.
ALL COUNTRIES EXCEPT LISTED: The applicable filing date for all countries is now July 1, 2019 which is a considerable improvement.
CHINA: The applicable filing date for China is now September 1, 2017.
INDIA: The applicable filing date for India is now March 17, 2017.
DATES FOR FILING OF EMPLOYMENT-BASED VISA APPLICATIONS
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
Your priority date for NIW EB-2 and EB-1 is established the date your I-140 petition is filed. Your priority date must be before the date listed on the chart above in order for us to file your Adjustment of Status application.
- If you have an approved I-140 petition in the EB-1 or EB-2 category with a current priority date, it is time to file your I-485 adjustment of status application;
- If you have a pending I-140 in the EB-1 or EB-2 category with a current priority date, you may interfile your I-485 adjustment of status application; or
- If you are filing an I-140 petition in the EB-1 or EB-2 category and want to file both the I-140 petition and I-485 application concurrently, you can now do so once again.
SENATE BILL 386 and HR 1044
The news today that Senate Bill 386 would be brought forward on Thursday Sept. 19 when Sen. Rand Paul announced he would lift his block of “Unanimous Consent” caused quite a bit of concern among some of our clients and excitement among others. What all our clients need to understand is what “Unanimous Consent” means. Unanimous consent does not mean that the law will be passed, it simply means that it can move the bill forward on the Senate floor toward a vote without Senate debate. Sen. Paul removing his hold/block does not mean that another Senator will not block Senate Bill 386. For unanimous consent to pass all of the 100 Senators must consent to move the legislation on without further debate. If no single Senator blocks consent, then it would go to the floor to be voted on at some point in the future. To pass, the law requires a majority vote of 51 to pass. While it is premature to know with any certainty what will happen, it is a prudent time for citizens of all countries, including India and China, who are considering filing for an Employment Based green card to plan for a possible change in the law.
With the uncertainty of House Bill HR1044 and Senate Bill S386, as well as the new rule on public charges and the current immigration climate, great care needs to be taken in preparing the I-485 Adjustment of Status application prior to filing. The Dunn Law Firm was founded over 100 years ago and has one of the most experienced immigration law teams in the U.S. The team is one of the countries most experienced with filing I-485 Adjustment of Status applications and we are ready to help you file your I-140 and/or I-485 Adjustment of Status application. We offer extremely prompt and accurate processing and personal service to each application and you are always able to speak to or email your Attorney or Paralegal directly when needed. The timing of when to file your I-485 can have a significant impact on your current immigration status and can affect your future plans. We recommend that you contact our office immediately to discuss your situation in detail.
Please contact our office at (309) 828-6241 or email firstname.lastname@example.org if you are ready to file your I-140 and/or I-485. You may also visit our website at www.nationalinterestwaivers.com to obtain more information.
On July 10, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019 (H.R. 1044), which proposes to eliminate the per-country limit for all employment-based immigrants and increase the per-country limit for all family-sponsored immigrants from 7 percent to 15 percent.
There exists a long-standing rule in the United States that for an individual to be permitted to immigrate to the U.S., that individual must be able to financially support himself or herself. In other words, individuals who are or would be primarily dependent upon U.S. government assistance would not be eligible for immigration
Legislatively, a person falling into that category has been designated a “public charge”. More simply put, a public charge is an individual who is not capable of financially supporting himself or herself and who instead relies upon the U.S. government to do so.
In October 2018, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) proposed to expand the definition of a “public charge”. [CIS No. 2499-10; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2010-0012, Oct. 10, 2018] More specifically, a series of proposed rules was published that, among other things, expanded the scope of what levels of government financial assistance – or “public benefits” – would render an individual a public charge.
The stated purpose of the proposed rules is that the “DHS seeks to better ensure that applicants for admission to the United States and applicants for adjustment of status . . . who are subject to the public charge ground are self-sufficient, i.e. do not depend on public resources to meet their needs, but rather rely on their own capabilities and the resources of their family, sponsor, and private organizations.”
The proposed rules would require that foreign nationals who are seeking an adjustment of status “demonstrate that they have not received, are not currently receiving, nor are likely to receive, public benefits as defined in the proposed rule.” Should they be unable to make such a showing, these individuals would not be eligible for permanent U.S. residence.
The proposed rules are complex, multi-layered, and span 183 pages in the Federal Register.
HOW DOES THE PROPOSED CHANGE POTENTIALLY AFFECT FOREIGN NATIONALS SEEKING PERMANENT U.S. RESIDENCY?
If these proposed rules are enacted and the definition of a public charge is broadened, additional types of government assistance would be considered in making the determination whether an individual is considered a public charge. This subsequently would mean that individuals who are seeking an adjustment of status will have to meet a higher threshold to show that they are not likely to become a public charge.
Undoubtedly, the proposed rules will allow a fewer number of individuals – particularly those receiving any kind of government benefits – to be eligible for an adjustment of status or a visa. In fact, as the new rules propose to broaden the scope of what public benefits would bar a person from an adjustment of status, commentators have estimated that this could affect thousands of prospective foreign nationals seeking to become permanent residents.
HOW CAN THOMAS J. ARKELL AND DUNN LAW FIRM HELP?
Thomas J. Arkell provides valuable advice to clients regarding how the previous or current use of public benefits could affect their I-485 Adjustment of Status (“AOS”) application. Should these proposed rules go into effect, Mr. Arkell’s twenty years of immigration experience will undoubtedly be useful in navigating the complexities of the rules.
As discussed previously in this blog, taking every precaution to ensure that an AOS petition is approved has become magnified now that a petitioner who receives an outright denial of an AOS petition can possibly be subject to the issuance of a Notice to Appear, which could then lead to subsequent deportation.
Mr. Arkell has provided vital legal advice to thousands of foreign nationals and – having gone through the Immigration process himself – understands the magnitude of proper legal guidance at this important time in his clients’ lives. If you would like to contact Dunn Law Firm to discuss your credentials or to discuss a FREE consultation with Mr. Arkell, click HERE.
Dunn Law Firm has always taken great pride in a personalized approach to its clientele. Senior Immigration Partner, Thomas J. Arkell, possesses a deep understanding of the permanent U.S. resident and citizenship processes, having gone through both himself. He also understands the human element of the visa process and knows first-hand the importance of efficiency in completing the NIW application, both for peace of mind and so his clients can receive their approval that much more quickly.
We have always felt that our website should reflect this understanding and Mr. Arkell’s approach. Every element should be conceived and executed with the needs of the client front-and-center. That is why we are pleased to announce that we have just completed a major redesign of the site.
Aimed at improving navigability and making information related to the National Interest Waiver easier to locate, our redesign significantly changes the look and feel of NationalInterestWaivers.com. From the beginning, our goal was to make things more welcoming and more user-friendly. That’s why one of the biggest changes involved streamlining how we present information.
On our homepage, details about pricing, approval rate, and our money-back guarantee are now positioned front-and-center. It’s also much easier to request a free consultation with Mr. Arkell, and our updated payment plans are organized so they are simpler to understand. We have also significantly expanded our section on client testimonials and added a great deal more content to our approvals page.
Together, these changes make it easier to understand what we have done for our past clients, and what we can do for prospective ones. They also allow applicants to form a more comprehensive understanding of what’s necessary to qualify for a National Interest Waiver. And finally, they more definitively show what sets us apart from our competitors – our knowledge, expertise, and dedication to helping each and every one of our clients thrive. From the start, our commitment was and always will be to our clients. Mr. Arkell and his Immigration Team possess both the knowledge and the experience necessary to help people avoid the challenging, cumbersome labor certification process by successfully petitioning for a National Interest Waiver. The website redesign is just one more way for us to demonstrate our commitment – and one more way we can help some of the best and brightest enter a country where they can use their exceptional talents and truly excel.
National Interest Waivers (“NIW”) offer a unique route for individuals with exceptional ability to obtain permanent residence in the United States without labor certification or a U.S. job offer. In his new ebook, Your Guide To National Interest Waiver Petitions, Thomas J. Arkell, senior partner at Dunn Law Firm, LLP, explains what a National Interest Waiver is, who is eligible, and how individuals can successfully apply.
Thomas J. Arkell leads Dunn Law Firm’s immigration team. With over 20 years of immigration law experience, Mr. Arkell has helped hundreds of researchers, Ph.D. students, doctors, and scientists fulfill their dream of permanent residency in the United States. Mr. Arkell, who himself came to the U.S. as an international student before gaining permanent residency and U.S. citizenship, has a unique personal and professional commitment to helping individuals with exceptional abilities obtain permanent residency.
Your Guide To National Interest Waiver Petitions is a concise yet comprehensive guide written to help prospective NIW petitioners understand whether they are eligible, the process of applying for a NIW, how long that process takes, the evidence that the USCIS requires, and how much petitioners should expect to pay.
Those who file a NIW petition are effectively requesting that the labor certification requirement – which is ordinarily mandatory when seeking employment-based permanent residence – be waived because it is in the national interest of the U.S. This labor certification process not only requires sponsorship from a U.S. employer, but it also can be long and cumbersome. Accordingly, one of the major benefits of an NIW is that it can effectively avoid any of those labor certification headaches.
Eligibility criteria are discussed in depth in the ebook, but, in brief, individuals with exceptional ability who can demonstrate that their employment in the U.S. would benefit the country are most likely to be approved.
For more detailed information on NIW petitions, you can access Your Guide To National Interest Waiver Petitions here.
Importantly, if you feel that you may meet these requirements and would be interested in initiating the NIW process, Mr. Arkell and Dunn Law Firm would be happy to discuss a FREE consultation to start you on the path to permanent U.S. residence.
USCIS adjudicators have recently received more latitude to deny immigration applications, petitions and requests. Last month, a USCIS policy memorandum (PM-601-0163) became effective that affords the USCIS the ability to deny an application without first issuing a Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny if the application lacks a certain degree of requisite evidence. This increase in discretion potentially could have an impact upon a number of routes to permanent residence, including National Interest Waivers.
By way of background, prior to this policy memorandum, if a foreign national filed a petition that was devoid of certain information, the USCIS nearly always would issue either a Request for Evidence (“RFE”) or a Notice of Intent to Deny (“NOID”) with the purpose of putting the foreign national on notice that the petition was deficient in certain areas and giving him or her a chance to rectify its shortcomings. Previously, the adjudicators had been instructed by the USCIS to issue RFEs or NOIDs upon receiving an incomplete petition unless the petition had “no possibility” of being enhanced with additional information. Outright denials, therefore, were extremely rare.
Now however, since the effective date of this memo, adjudicators have the ability to deny a case – including a National Interest Waiver petition – without the issuance of an RFE or NOID if it lacks enough supporting evidence to establish eligibility. In other words, if an individual deficiently files a petition, the USCIS is under no obligation to give that individual notice that the petition is incomplete, or a chance to address the deficiencies and fill in the gaps. In fact, the memo seems to actually encourage adjudicators to be more aggressive with denying cases outright.
This change puts significantly more pressure on a foreign national seeking permanent U.S. residence to ensure that his or her application is not only complete, but compelling. No longer will an individual likely get a chance to amend a sloppily-filed petition – it will need to be done right the first time.
The process of preparing and organizing an NIW petition can be document-intensive and involves numerous moving parts that can be extremely difficult to manage if attempting to file alone. Particularly, the tasks necessary for an effective NIW application include obtaining properly written and persuasive recommendation letters, preparing the documentation and forms that accompany the petition, drafting a convincing petition letter illustrating that the petitioner’s work is in the national interest, and properly filing the documentation and forms.
This understandably can be a daunting task without the proper guidance. Moreover, with the advent of this policy adjustment by the USCIS, there likely now is much more at stake.
To take it a step further, as noted in our previous blog post, should the petitioner receive an outright denial for perhaps a NIW or Adjustment of Status petition, and have no underlying immigration status, he or she could possibly be subject to the issuance of a Notice to Appear and subsequent deportation.
The potential impact of this policy memorandum once again magnifies the importance of securing the help of a responsive and experienced legal immigration team to maneuver through the potential pitfalls that can befall those trying to obtain permanent residence in the United States.
Thomas J. Arkell and his immigration team at Dunn Law Firm have successfully navigated the complexities of thousands of immigration filings. Why leave anything to chance? Let Dunn Law Firm ease your concerns and guide you on the road to green card success.
If you would like to contact Dunn Law Firm to discuss your credentials or to discuss a FREE consultation with Mr. Arkell, click HERE.
Recently, the U.S. government implemented a USCIS Policy Memorandum (PM-602-0050.1) that has increased the number of scenarios in which Notices to Appear will be issued.
Generally speaking, a Notice to Appear (“NTA”) is typically the first step in the removal or deportation process. More specifically, an NTA is a document that requires the recipient to appear before a judge in Immigration Court and effectively notifies the recipient that removal proceedings have begun against him or her.
WHAT DOES THE POLICY MEMORANDUM SPECIFY?
In pertinent part, the policy memorandum reads that “USCIS will issue an NTA where, upon issuance of an unfavorable decision on an application, petition, or benefit request, the alien is not lawfully present in the United States.” The USCIS began implementing this policy on October 1, 2018.
The practical application of this memo is that if the USCIS denies, for example, an I-485 Adjustment of Status (“AOS”) petition and the individual has no other underlying status, then an NTA will be issued to that individual.
DOES THIS EFFECT EMPLOYMENT-BASED CASES?
The short answer is, not yet.
In the memo, the USCIS notes that the issuance of NTAs after an unfavorable decision on an application, petition or benefit request “will not be implemented with respect to employment-based petitions…at this time.”
Accordingly, while this policy will not currently affect employment-based cases, there appears to be an indication that it could be extended to such cases at some point.
WHAT ABOUT NATIONAL INTEREST WAIVERS?
Because National Interest Waivers (“NIWs”) are employment-based, NIW petitions too – at least for the time being – are not affected by this policy memorandum. However, as discussed above, it seems that this could be a distinct possibility sometime in the not so distant future.
Should this memo eventually be implemented to apply to employment-based cases, it could then have a direct and material effect upon those applying for an NIW petition. As an example, should a foreign national who has no other underlying status apply for an NIW and AOS and have either of those petitions denied, he or she would be issued an NTA, which could effectively spell the end to his or her time in the United States.
As a result, it is highly recommended that potential NIW and/or AOS petitioners – regardless of whether they are filing now or in the future – hire a competent experienced legal team to greatly increase their chance of success, and thereby decrease the risk of denial and deportation. Attempting to apply for any of these petitions by oneself or without the guidance of a firm with a proven track record leaves a great deal to chance.
Thomas J. Arkell and his immigration team at Dunn Law Firm have helped thousands of international students, scholars, physicians, researchers and professionals become permanent residents of the United States. Mr. Arkell’s team has had a tremendous amount of success with both NIW and AOS petitions and would be happy to help you expedite your path to permanent residence in the U.S.
If you would like to contact Dunn Law Firm to discuss your credentials or to discuss a FREE consultation with Mr. Arkell, click HERE.